Les Mandarin Jakarta Tangerang dan Online.

Jago Mandarin Group

  • Home
  • Guru
  • Program
    • Biaya
    • Mandarin Bisnis
    • Ujian HSK
    • Korporat
  • Online
    • Surabaya
    • Medan
    • Bandung
    • Makassar
  • Lainnya
    • Jasa Penerjemah
    • Loker Tangerang
    • Buat Nama Mandarin
  • Gratis
    • Tes Kemampuan
    • Artikel

China's Educational Success Is Taking a Toll on Students

June 04, 2015 by Baldwin Husin

Compare Amy Chua, the author of Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, to Liu Weihua and Zhang Xinwu and she comes out looking like a pussy cat. Well before Amy was making her daughters practice their instruments four hours a day, Liu and Zhang were credited with turning their daughter Yiting into an overnight celebrity in their native China, the very crucible of tiger parenting.

Not for singing or dancing on a TV talent show, which is the way most British children find overnight fame. Instead Yiting became famous for being the paragon of everything a Chinese child should be: She brought honor to her family by winning a full scholarship to Harvard. The resulting book, Harvard Girl Liu Yiting: a character training record, became the must-read manual for other Chinese families also seeking the holy grail of a place at an Ivy League college or Oxbridge. It went on to sell two million copies and spawned 70 copycat versions, including Yale Girl and Ivy League’s Not a Dream. All were based on the premise that with a strict upbringing and intense hard work any Chinese family could win the dream ticket.

Yiting’s parents started early. While still a baby, they placed toys just out of her reach to make her try harder to get them. At primary school, they timed her work to prepare for exams and encouraged her to hold ice in her hands for endurance. At the same time as Harvard Girl became a best-seller, there was one more development which increased the temperature still further in the global hothouse. In 2000, the first results of the Programme for International Student Assessment were published to compare education systems around the world. Across the globe, 26 countries put forward a representative sample of their 15-year-olds to be compared in tests on maths, science, and reading.

In the early days, China did not take part. But as the number of participants grew, in 2009 it dipped its toe in the water. It entered the children of Shanghai, the country’s most affluent petri dish of achievement, where 80 percent of children go to university. It was an impressive debut. Immediately Shanghai, with a population the size of Ghana, entered the chart at number one. The result triggered an unprecedented wave of panic among Western countries whose economies had also been slipping down the league. From starting out in the top ten in the first table, the U.K. had now dropped to twenty-fifth for reading, twenty-eighth for maths and sixteen for science. American and French pupils also scored poorly.

Baca Juga: Mata Kuliah Sastra Cina UI

Western politicians rushed to condemn children for not working hard enough. The UK’s then-education secretary, Michael Gove, called it a “Sputnik moment”—after the moment the Americans realised they were falling behind the Russians in the space race.

“We are in a global race,” he warned. “Our children are competing against children in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Singapore, and we need to make sure our national curriculum—the standards we set—are as rigorous, as tough, as those on the other side of the world.”

“If that's what they are doing in China… and some of the countries with the best educational standards in the world, we have got to do that here.”

But while Gove may be gone, there is still no sign that his knee-jerk “for God’s sake, knuckle down and get on with some work for once approach” to education is being reversed by his successor. Regiment the national curriculum. Test children at every opportunity was apparently the answer. But also remember that you are dealing with children and you have to be careful what you wish for—let alone how you want to achieve it.

Contrasting Western and Eastern education has never been a comparison of like with like. A closer look at the classrooms which produce these results shows that China’s success comes at a high cost. And it’s the Chinese themselves who are the first to admit it. In China, children spend more than a month longer in school a year than our children, and the school day lasts nine hours—with breaks for eye massages to reduce eye strain and physical activity to keep concentration levels high. One study found that up to 90 percent of Asian schoolchildren, including those living in China, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea, are nearsighted. This has been put down to them spending too much time indoors studying and not enough time outside in the sunlight. By comparison, the overall rate of myopia in the U.K. is between 20 and 30 percent.

Furthermore, the school bell in many countries in the far east is just the end of the first shift. Children then move on to cram schools. These are taken so seriously that in neighbouring South Korea, and across the far east, inspectors launch lightning raids to enforce curfews to prevent them teaching pupils past 10 p.m. Nor are children thriving under the pressure. A  survey of nine- to twelve-year-olds in the eastern province of Zhejiang by University College London found that more than 80 percent worried “a lot” about exams, while two-thirds feared punishment by their teachers. Look on YouTube and you will find examples of explosive violence by teachers against pupils. When questioned, three-quarters of the Chinese children surveyed say they are also scared of being physically punished by their parents.

Some see no way out. A 2009 study found that 24 percent of 2,500 students in Shanghai there have thought about killing themselves, mostly in response to exam stress. Last March, a boy apparently threw himself out of his classroom window rather than deal with the shame of not excelling in his university entrance exams. But of course the supreme irony is that despite being the envy of every country, the Chinese are calling their education system a failure.

At the same time as Western governments strive to make their schools more Asian, Asian governments are trying to make their schools more European and creative. The phrase gaofen dinen has now passed into general useage, meaning students who get high scores but have low ability and never learn to take initiative.

And while we fret here about poor maths scores, the Chinese also point to another test, which did not grab the headlines, which found that in tests of creativity and imagination, their children came fifth from bottom. “The results are shocking,” China Daily warned. “Children had almost no chance to use their imagination. From the first day of school they are pushed into a culture of exams, exams, and more exams.”

Changes under discussion at the Chinese Ministry of Education include stopping written homework for primary school pupils and encouraging kids in non-academic extracurricular activities to produce more well-rounded children.

More and more Chinese parents are also seeking to educate their children at home. There has even been a boom in alternative education such as  Waldorf  Steiner schools in China, with the movement now being described as a powerful counter-cultural force. One such school, the Chengdu Waldorf school in the South West of the country has a five year waiting list.

At the very heart of this system is Peking University High School deputy principal Jiang Xueqin, who is damning in his assessment of Chinese methods.

“It’s a test-oriented education system, which means that students are taught from a very early age how to beat tests. The failings of a rote-memorisation system are well known: lack of social and practical skills, absence of self-discipline and imagination, loss of curiosity and passion for learning.

“One way we’ll know we’re succeeding in changing China’s schools is when those scores come down.”

Les mandarin yang efektif dan terjangkau? Hanya di JagoMandarin.com!

June 04, 2015 /Baldwin Husin

Asia first bilingual food education book: educating kids to think. cook. save. our food release today

June 04, 2015 by Baldwin Husin

(Hong Kong, 9th June, 2014) Think. Cook. Save., a Health and Food Education program organized by Go.Asia (www.go.asia), partnered with Alvina Cookery and Towngas Cooking Centre announce to release a new book, “Educating Kids to Think. Cook. Save. Our Food” today.

The book is to further promote the concept of Think. Cook. Save. Not only is the book a healthy diet guide, the book also provides a systematic structure to educate children on balanced diets. The guide will target parents, teachers and those who are interested in learning more about food and healthy diet. The book will be sold at Towngas Cooking Centre and all major bookstores. The authors will be donating the royalty fee to support the food education program.

Content Summary

“We need every child to understand where food comes from, how to cook it, and how it affects their body. This is about setting kids up with the knowledge they need to make better food choices for life.” Jamie Oliver

This book is a complete guide to teach children how to develop a healthy diet!

Baca Juga: Tempat Kursus Bahasa Inggris di Pare yang Harus Diketahui

Introducing the concept “Think, Cook and Save,” we aim to help children to get rid of bad eating habits, including junk food addiction and wasting food.

Think: To know where your food come from and learn more living skill.
Cook: To cook together and learn some simple, fun and healthy recipes
Save: To cherish our food resources

Highlight

The concept of Think.Cook.Save. comes from Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution Hong Kong division
Hong Kong First Food Education book. Food Education is popular in Switzerland, Belgium, Italy and other European countries, it has been the talking point in Japan and Taiwan recently and it’s now landed in Hong Kong!
Advisory Team: Professor Joseph J.Y. Sung, President, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Mr. William, Mark Yiu Tong, Renowned Food Critic, Mr. Perry Mak, Publisher, Hong Kong Economic Times and Towngas Cooking Centre
Recipes designed by Celebrity Chef Alvina Chan, Food Revolution Ambassador Beatrice Chan and the tutors from Towngas Cooking Centre
Bilingual Content. Good for education.
Massive use of color photos and cartoons. Children will love reading the book.
About the Authors

Alvina Chan
After graduating from Columbia University and Georgetown University, Alvina spent 7 years on Wall Street in New York & Hong Kong. Passionate about her culinary dreams, she attended Le Cordon Bleu Paris and achieved remarkable results, obtaining 1st in French Cuisine with “Mention Bien” (Distinction).  Given her positive influence in food culture promoting Healthy Cooking & Respect for Food, she is now the first disciple of Willie Mark, an internationally recognized food critic. Author of two books: “Banquets for the Soul,” & “Alone in Paris – Transforming Perspectives in the World’s Most Famous Cooking School,” She is now also a TV culinary show host for TVB and Creation TV.

Beatrice Chan

Chief, Go.Asia | Founder, Think.Cook.Save. Health and Food Education | Ambassador, Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution | Columnist

Books available in :
Towngas Cooking Center (9A, Lee Theatre, Causewaybay)
and Major Book Store
Joint Publishing HK, The Commercial Press, Chung Hwa Book, Page One, Popular Book, Hon Wing Book Company, Eslite HK, Lagardere (Relay@HK Airport)

June 04, 2015 /Baldwin Husin

Southeast Asian parents want kids to use devices for learning – study

June 04, 2015 by Baldwin Husin

A recent study by TheAsianParent.com points to an overwhelming majority of Southeast Asian families with tablets and other mobile devices allowing their kids to use those devices.

Commissioned by Samsung Kidstime in partnership with TheAsianParent.com, "Mobile Device Usage Among Young Kids: A Southeast Asia Study” surveyed a representative sample of 2,714 parents from Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand with at least 3,917 children aged between 3 and 8 years. 

According to their findings, 98% of Southeast Asian parents allow their kids to use tablets and other mobile devices. From this, 80% primarily allow this to supplement their education.

Baca Juga: Bahasa Mandarin Jadi Mapel Baru di Afrika Selatan

Aside from education, however, some are primarily motivated by giving their kids early exposure to technology (68%), providing their kids with entertainment (57%), and keeping their kids preoccupied (55%).

Parents are also concerned with the negative effects of device use among their kids, with most being afraid of a risk to their children’s health (92%), followed by the risk of children becoming addicted to their devices (90%) or being exposed to inappropriate content (88%).

Parents are also concerned about high billing charges from in-app purchases made by their kids (67%), as well as damage to the devices themselves (60%).

The study also notes that 41% of the children are likely to use a device for longer than an hour, though for different uses depending on the age. 

The study says, "While children aged 3 to 5 years mostly consume educational apps, videos and games, children aged 6 to 8 years start playing more games in relation to using educational apps and watching videos.” This increase in playing games goes against what parents want their kids to use such devices for – education. 

This leads to most parents (94%) wanting parental control mechanisms. The most requested parental control features including the ability to set usage time limits on devices (72%), in-app purchase blocking and controls (67%), and the ability to monitor of children's usage or progress (66%).

June 04, 2015 /Baldwin Husin

Asia's wealthy want their kids to study abroad

June 04, 2015 by Baldwin Husin

Wealthy people in Asia are investing more in their children's education, with those in China favoring having their children study overseas with other students of the same social status, according to Shanghai's China Business News.

Lee Woon Shiu, managing director and head of Wealth Planning, Trusts & Insurance at the Bank of Singapore, said high net-worth individuals often hope their children can have a more international outlook and the first step is to send them to an international school.

To educate a child for 13 years at an international school that covers both primary and high-school education in Hong Kong, parents need to pay over HK$2 million (US$260,000) in tuition, the paper said.

There are also other fees, such as a capital levy and the cost of other activities, the newspaper added.

Lee added that many parents also emphasize education in areas outside basic school subjects, such as music, theater and dance, and private banks usually arrange events for their customers and their children to interact with artists.

A more recent trend taking place among the rich in Asia, the newspaper said, is making big donation to schools. Chinese property developers Pan Shiyi and his wife Zhang Xin donated US$100 million to Yale University, while Chinese-Australian Kingold Group chair Zhou Zerong gave AU$25 million (US$19.6 million) to the University of Technology Sydney.

Baca Juga: Tarif Penerjemahan Bahasa Mandarin

Lee said the donations may not have been made specifically to pave the way for the donors' children to be accepted by the schools, but it will certainly help with future applications.

Asian parents are also eager to see the school for themselves. In a 2014 survey on why wealthy individuals travel abroad, the fourth most commonly cited purpose, at 12%, was to check schools for their children, ahead of going abroad to check on investments or immigration opportunities.

As a result, private banks also arrange such trips for their clients, summer camps for their children, or meetings with heads of recruitment at prominent schools, the newspaper said.

High net-worth people in Asia, Lee said, also pay great attention to whom their children study with, preferring that their classmates come from the same social circles.

Parents often choose a school for their children based on such factors as the percentage of graduates accepted by Ivy League schools and the backgrounds of the students' parents, Lee added.

The education survey of the wealthy conducted by the Hurun Report also found that 80% of respondents in China planned to send their children to study abroad, the highest percentage in the world.

Some 19.4% of respondents said they would invest in a foreign country for their children's education, the second most popular reason for investing abroad, according to the Hurun Report survey.

June 04, 2015 /Baldwin Husin

Expat Kids Education – Go Local or International?

June 04, 2015 by Baldwin Husin

The question of what school your child will attend in a new country is one that many expats have to face. One of the principle concerns many expats face is ensuring that their children receive the best possible education while living abroad. However, this is a feat that can be fraught with complications.

While every country’s education system is different, and while one must be wary of making sweeping country-wide generalizations about education, there are some universal conclusions that one can draw about certain types of schools.

While not every expat will have the option of sending their child to either a local school or an international one, those that do will need to realize that it’s important to understand the benefits and disadvantages of these two different types of schools.

Baca Juga: Mandarin Chinese Private Tutor Jakarta

Quality and Cost

In some countries, the state education system is of a high standard and local schools will often offer an education system that is as good as or even better than the curricula adhered to at various international schools, and most importantly, it won’t cost you a penny.

This is not necessarily always the case though, so first and foremost, expats should research the local public system, and evaluate whether or not it would be a plausible option. This process includes consulting with individual schools, with networks of expats who’ve had similar experiences and with families who have students currently enrolled in the schools.

Also for consideration is the fact that international schools around the world almost always have higher fees than public schools, yet they may not necessarily offer anything close to the quality of education or facilities that certain public or state schools can offer.

Cultural pros and cons

Furthermore, aside from offering the same level of quality, local schools also have the potential to provide a platform on which children can quickly become fluent in the local language. Chances are that children who attend local schools will also learn and understand the customs and culture of the local country much quicker; something which is important, especially if you intend to stay in a country long-term.

Being part of a local school community will also help you, as a parent, to become more involved in local events and issues, thereby giving you greater insight and appreciation for the country you’re in.

On the other hand, children who go to international schools often find themselves neither part of the culture of the country they are in, nor the country they are from, merely an approximation of it.

Thus, when they go to university they may find that many of their peers have completely different cultural touchstones, despite the fact that they went through the same education system.

If your child is attending an international school, it may be worth getting them involved in extramural activities, such as sports or social clubs, outside of their school. This may help them to meet and make friends with children from the local community, and it may encourage them to become better acquainted with the local language and culture.

University and college admission

The opportunities for further studies abroad or in a child’s home country may be more limited with a local school. Sending your child to an international school helps to broaden these prospects, and provides the opportunity to choose between a local university or one in your home country (depending on the teaching of your child’s first language).  At a time when university slots are scarce and fees are high, increasing the number of institutions your child can apply to may be worthwhile.

A compromise

Making a decision between local and international schools is often very difficult, and there are a lot of competing interests that must be balanced.  However, a good compromise is to send your children to a local school when they are young so that they get the benefit of becoming bi-lingual, then sending them to an international school for the last portion of their education.

This ensures that they get the best of both worlds; a second language, an experience of the local culture, local and international friends and a leg-up on furthering their education either in their adopted country or abroad.

June 04, 2015 /Baldwin Husin
  • Newer
  • Older

Guru
Biaya
HSK
Mandarin Bisnis
Korporat

Tangerang
Surabaya
Medan
Bandung
Makassar

Tes Kemampuan
Instagram
Artikel
Jasa Penerjemah
Lowongan
Jago Mandarin Online